Key works: Agent causal theories date back to Reid 1863.An important defence of theories of this sort was offered by Roderick Chisholm, in Chisholm 1976 (among other works). In the contemporary debate, the most important defender of agent causation is Timothy O'Connor; O'Connor 2000 is his most important work on the topic. Clarke 2003 contains an important sympathetic but ultimately skeptical.
Timothy O'Connor: Agent Causation. According to O’Connor,. c. explain compatibilism. d. explain an agent’s actions. Strawson suggests that on the agency theory, if the agent makes the preferred choice, the choice must be. a. coherent. b. random. c. fully rational. d. intelligible.
Start studying Agent Causation and The Mystery of Libertariansim (Van Inwagen). Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
Agent-Causality is the idea that agents can start new causal chains that are not pre-determined by the events of the immediate or distant past and the physical laws of nature. The first agent-causal libertarian was Aristotle, followed by Epicurus, and then Carneades. In more recent times, prominent agent-causalists have been Thomas Reid in the 18th century, followed by Roderick Chisholm.
Key works: In the contemporary debate, event-causal libertarianism has been most powerfully defended by Robert Kane; Kane 1996 is the most complete statement of his position. O'Connor 2000 is perhaps the best articulated defence of agent-causation. Ginet 1990 and McCann 1998 are influential defences of non-causal theories. Clarke 2003 is careful and penetrating overview.
Soft determinism is the view that determinism and free will are compatible. It is thus a form of compatibilism. The term was coined by the American philosopher William James (1842-1910) in his essay “The Dilemma of Determinism.”.
Timothy O'Connor: Agent Causation. Essay Questions. Chapter 6. Chapter 7. Flash Cards. Weblinks. Contact Your Sales Rep. Higher Education Comment Card. Peter van Inwagen: The Incompatibility of Free Will and Determinism. According to van Inwagen, if a man refrained from performing a certain act.
Is Agent Causation the Means to Genuine Free Will? While O’Connor admits that his assertions don’t explain all of the open questions left by the agent causation theory, he does identify two areas that need to be investigated further in order to have agent causation satisfactorily provide genuine free will.
But if we have that warrant, then although affirming agent causation, we may fairly say that any given instance of it is nothing over and above a certain process of causation by events or states—it is no addition of being.18 18 Strictly speaking, if the causation by events or states that realizes some instance of agent causation is, in turn, realized in causation by substances, then.
View Agent Causation Research Papers on Academia.edu for free.
Diversity Reading List Helping you include authors from under-represented groups in your teaching.
This chapter begins by characterizing event causation and agent causation, and then looks at strategies for attempting to reduce one of these species of causation to the other. In the end, arguments are presented in favour of the view that talk in terms of event causation — to the extent that it should strictly be countenanced at all — is best understood as elliptical for talk in terms of.
Chisholm replies to an objection to his agent causation theory of free will. The objection says that doing something to your hand would require first doing something to your brain, which (the objection says) is plainly not a requirement on doing something to your hand.
Some problems about agent causation. 3 Denying free will. It might seem at this point as though belief in free will, whether accompanied by compatibilism or incompatibilism, leads to very serious problems. This might lead you to think that the best position on the issue would be to give up belief in free will altogether. Why this is difficult.
Agent causation, or Agent causality, is an idea in philosophy which states that an agent can start new causal chains not determined by prior events. This is in contrast to causal determinism. Defenders of this theory include Thomas Reid and Roderick Chisholm. See also. Libertarianism (metaphysics) Volition; Kalam cosmological argument.
The sweet mystery of compatibilism.. Cambridge University Press. --1994. The Metaphysics of Free Will: An Essay on Control.. The Theory of Agent Causation has always been formulated as.
Agent Causation and Free Will Question. I am a philosophy student studying the question of free will, and I was wondering if you have any thoughts on resources (both pro and con) on agent causation and its role in libertarian free will.
In a recent paper I argued that agent causation theorists should be compatibilists. In this paper, I argue that compatibilists should be agent causation theorists. I consider six of the main problems facing compatibilism: (i) the powerful intuition.
I offer a brief review of, and critical response to, Neil Levy’s fascinating recent book Hard Luck, where he argues that no one is ever free or morally responsible not because of determinism or indeterminism, but because of luck. Two of Levy’s central arguments in defending his free will nihilism concern the nature and role of explanation in a theory of moral responsibility and the nature.